In a day in which “Google” has assumed the status of a verb, the increasing role of search engines is readily apparent. Less well known is the significance of the ongoing shift from keyword to semantic search. Yet, as physicist and computer scientist W. Daniel Hillis points out, with semantic search results are determined not by data but by the proprietor's Weltanshauung. Thus, search engines have moved from indicators of what is important to arbiters of truth. “From now on, search engines will have an editorial point of view, and
search results will reflect that viewpoint,” he concludes. “We can no longer ignore the
assumptions behind the results.” Nor Hillis' analysis. The Opinions of Search Engines
Showing posts with label Edge. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Edge. Show all posts
Sunday, February 03, 2013
Saturday, January 19, 2013
Tempus Non Fugit
Time waits for no man, they say, but will man wait for time? “If we assume that networks will continue to get faster,” cyber analyst Nicholas Carr writes in response to Edge's 2013 inquiry, “we can also conclude that we'll become more and more impatient,
more and more intolerant of even microseconds of delay.” Accordingly, Carr continues “we'll be less likely to experience anything
that requires us to wait, that doesn't provide us with instant
gratification.” In short, grown men shall act as peevish toddlers throwing temper tantrums when their appetites are not sated immediately. The Patience Deficit
Labels:
cyberspace,
Edge,
Nicholas Carr,
patience,
society,
technology,
time
Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Word Inflation Drives Devaluation
“If we have a million photos, we tend to value each one less than if we
only had ten,” Yale University computer scientist David Galertner opens his reply to Edge's 2013 question: What should we be worried about? “The Internet forces a general devaluation of the written
word: a global deflation in the average word's value,” he continues. As
each word attracts less time and money from readers, it garners less time and effort from writers. As investment by writers and readers declines, society's ability to communicate decays, delivering what Galertner aptly describes as a “body blow to science, scholarship, the arts—to nearly
everything, in fact, that is distinctively human.” Worry About Internet Drivel
Labels:
communication,
cyberspace,
David Galertner,
Edge,
literacy,
reading,
words,
writing
What, Me Worry?
The mission of Edge is succinctly, if self-servingly, stated: "To arrive at the edge of the world's knowledge, seek out the most
complex and sophisticated minds, put them in a room together, and have
them ask each other the questions they are asking themselves." Each year, Edge poses a question to its hand-picked clique of scientists, scholars, writers, artists, and sundry thinkers. This year, the question is: "What should we be worried about?" The essays culled for publication merit our attention, if only for the insights they provide into what the self-proclaimed "Brights" may have in mind for the 99%. Verbum Sapientis will spotlight a few of our selections here. Stay tuned.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

