Showing posts with label words. Show all posts
Showing posts with label words. Show all posts
Wednesday, August 21, 2013
Buzzwords Drone On
Monday, August 05, 2013
Building Blocks of English: Affixes
Affixes are building blocks of language. The four types are prefixes, suffixes, combining forms, and infixes. We are familiar with prefixes, which placed at the beginning of words qualify their meaning (inappropriate) and suffixes, which convert the stem into another part of speech (celebrate to celebration). Combining forms, which can be either prefixes or suffixes, add another layer of meaning to words (biochemistry; pesticide). The least common affixes are infixes, which are placed within a word (in this case, to form the plural cupsful).
Monday, January 28, 2013
A Wealth of Words
There’s a positive correlation between a student’s vocabulary and the likelihood he'll graduate from college and his future income, Prof. E.D Hirsch, Jr. notes in a recent commentary. Vocabulary is a
relevant proxy for a range of educational attainments ― not just skill in reading, writing, listening, and speaking,
but knowledge of science, history, and the arts. “If we want
to reduce economic inequality,” he concludes, “a good place to start is the
language-arts classroom.” A Wealth of Words
Monday, January 21, 2013
Parsing Punditry
“A bun is the lowest form of
wheat,” my father would say to me as a lad, recalling the general opinion of
the status of the pun as a purported form of wit. As an inveterate punster in
my college days — I'll spare you the painful proof, I defended the art as a literary form, noting the self-evident
fact that puns are crafted to solicit groans, not laughs. But how did the pun
acquire such a dubious reputation? the BBC News Magazine asks and
answers. It's an intriguing analysis, as one might expect from the source, but, caveat emptor, cites
several puns. The Pun
ConundrumWednesday, January 16, 2013
Word Inflation Drives Devaluation
“If we have a million photos, we tend to value each one less than if we
only had ten,” Yale University computer scientist David Galertner opens his reply to Edge's 2013 question: What should we be worried about? “The Internet forces a general devaluation of the written
word: a global deflation in the average word's value,” he continues. As
each word attracts less time and money from readers, it garners less time and effort from writers. As investment by writers and readers declines, society's ability to communicate decays, delivering what Galertner aptly describes as a “body blow to science, scholarship, the arts—to nearly
everything, in fact, that is distinctively human.” Worry About Internet Drivel
Labels:
communication,
cyberspace,
David Galertner,
Edge,
literacy,
reading,
words,
writing
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
+vs.jpg)

